When discussing Parrott rifles, we really have to focus on the bands. The bands over the breech end of the cannon are what make the Parrott a Parrott, by type. Without the band, the Parrott would simply be a gun of cast-iron that generally followed the Ordnance Shape in exterior arrangements. One that would be prone to bursting. And thus something not likely to have seen much service. On the other hand, with the band in place, at least the field gun calibers were actually reputable weapons… relatively speaking.
And it is important to understand the variations of these bands. Some time back I highlighted the difference between the authentic, original Robert P. Parrott-designed, and West Point Foundry produced, guns and those “knock offs” from Tredegar. The Tredegar weapons had longer and thicker bands. This was due to construction techniques. In brief, the original, patented, Parrott design called for a single bar to be heated, formed into a spiral, then placed onto the breech (and turned as it cooled).
On the other hand, Tredegar lacked the lavish facilities of West Point Foundry (and one might also say was aloof to some of the advancement in metalworking… but that’s a complex story). So when “copying” the Parrott for Confederate orders, Tredegar modified the technique to construct the band. In short, Tredegar constructed a set of wrought iron rings or hoops. When heated, those slipped onto the breech and were butt welded together. As the rings cooled, they shrunk down onto the breech. Please note the basic technique was similar for Tredegar’s Parrott copies and larger weapons to include Brooke Rifles. These butt welded bands were not as strong as the spiral welds from West Point Foundry. So Tredegar allocated more metal to compensate.
As indicated above, Tredegar’s work was aimed at replicating the features of the northern weapon. Those copies were based on examples purchased just prior to the war (notably by Virginia) and others captured early in the war. One would suspect the features employed for this replication would be passed directly to other vendors producing Parrott-type rifles for the Confederacy, such as Macon Arsenal.
But such presumption should be given a “field test” with study of surviving pieces. And the place to do that is along Confederate Avenue at Gettysburg. There we find a pair of 20-pdr Parrotts from West Point, although a “Navy” weapon with breeching shackle attached:
A pair of 20-pdr Tredegar Parrotts:
And, recently returned to the field, a pair of 20-pdr Parrotts from Macon Arsenal:
(Yes, I should have stood to the right side of that Macon gun there… but Jim, I’m a blog writer, not a photographer!)
Measuring the length of the bands on these three, starting with the original, Yankee Parrott:
Just over 16 inches. I call it 16 ¼ inches overall.
Now the Tredegar Parrott:
Substantially longer. I would call it 21 ¼ inches overall.
And finally, back (on the road) to the Macon gun:
Hold the phone there! Look close at that tape:
Despite the “wiggle” in my tape, we have something shorter than the other two. I call it 15 ¾ inches, round about. So with three quick measures, we can throw out the presumption about Macon’s products just being straight copies of the Tredegar guns. Of course, you could probably deduce that by noting the clearance of the band on the standard NPS reproduction carriage.
But is the Macon band thicker, by chance, for compensation? Let’s start, for a baseline, back at the Federal Parrott:
Since the band edge is rounded off, we have to eye-ball this a bit. I call it at just over 1 ½ inches. I’ve seen secondary sources state this should be, precisely, 1.625 inches. But we are “in the field” and the 1 ½ inch measure will be OK for now.
Moving to Tredegar’s product:
I’d say this is just about the same thickness. Just over 1 ½ inches. Though there are secondary sources that credit the Tredegar band on 20-pdrs as being 2 inches thick. Let me take an assignment here to survey all surviving Tredegar 20-pdrs at Gettysburg for comparison. But for now, we have the 1 ½ inch measure to work with for our purposes.
Now back to Macon:
So you don’t have to strain the eyes too much, I had a second measure where I fiddled with the ferule a bit measuring the second of the pair:
Clearly in both cases the measure is LESS than 1 ½ inches. Substantially so. I’d call it 1 9/32 inches.
But you may have noticed that my ruler was “set up” off the actual barrel a bit. That’s because on both Macon Parrotts there is a “lip” or ring between the band and the barrel. Let’s look close:
The clearance on the first Macon Parrott is tighter, but on the second there is a clear separation between this lip and the other components of the gun. This is also clearly not a supplemental or inner band. My first thought was this lip was the remainder of some fitting that limited the advancement of the band during construction. But the more I looked at the lip, it appeared to be threaded.
And that, perhaps, would explain the different dimensions of the band. Speculation here, only, as no source I know of corroborates this. Perhaps Macon Arsenal threaded the bands onto the breech. Such also might explain the “scuffs” that appear on the guns today. If the bands were threaded, perhaps Macon felt the construction imparted additional strength over the butt welded bands and thus reduced dimensions. But again, I’m only speculating here based on appearances.
By all means, don’t just accept my speculation here. Go visit the guns and make your own observations. Then circle back to discuss!
Overall, let me offer this table for field measures of these three sets of Parrott rifles:
I would point out the measure taken in the field for both Confederate guns differs from printed secondary references. So more “field trips” are warranted for conformation.
One other measure to share…. looking at the bore of the Macon rifle:
The bore size corresponds to the 20-pdr caliber, properly, at around 3 ¾ inch, in the books supposed to be 3.67 inches. Notice the well defined rifling. This piece likely did not see much service. In all likelihood, the weapon was delivered in the spring of 1864, going to a location in Georgia. Given the outcome of that summer’s campaign, quite possible this 20-pdr was captured, and spent the rest of the war in some Federal depot.
Wonder what story this gun would tell if allowed to speak?