As the work from the fifth parallel drug on… slowly drug on… Major Thomas Brooks recorded a change of the duty regiment among the fatigue detail on August 31, 1863:
The Third U.S. Colored Troops, who have been on fatigue duty in the advanced trenches since the 20th instant, were relieved to-day by the Fifty-fourth Massachusetts Volunteers, it being desirable to have older troops for the important and hazardous duty required in the advance at this period. Infantry officers commanding fatigue details inform me that it requires much more effort to make the men work than fight under the same fire.
Again we find an example where the contingencies of war, at the very front edge, challenged society’s perceptions of race. As result authorities on the ground adjusted to meet the challenge in small ways. There’s a subtle point made in the journal entry: “men” behaved the same, and it was the “experience” that counted most.
As related yesterday, the Federals opted to employ their fatigue details within a rotation cycle. Although the rotation did nothing to reduced the danger or improve the overall living conditions, at least it afforded some recovery time for the troops. These rotations applied to all the regiments assigned to constructing the trenches. A significant portion of the troops assigned to the fatigue details were USCT – particularly the 3rd USCT and the 54th Massachusetts in the critical later phases of the operation. Black troops performed 56% of the fatigue detail duties (white troops performed all of the guard details on the line).
Shortly after Battery Wagner fell, Brooks sent out an inquiry among his fellow engineers regarding the performance of the USCT:
As the important experiment which will test the fitness of the American negro for the duties of a soldier is now being tried, it is desirable that facts bearing on the question be carefully observed and recorded.
It is probable that in no military operations of the war have negro troops done so large a proportion, and so important and hazardous, fatigue duty, as in the siege operations on this island.
The questions posed were:
I. Courage, as indicated by their behavior under fire.
II. Skill and appreciation of their duties, referring to the quality of the work performed.
III. Industry and perseverance, with reference to the quantity of the work performed.
IV. If a certain work were to be accomplished in the least possible time, i.e., when enthusiasm and direct personal interest are necessary to attain the end, would whites or blacks answer best?
V. What is the difference, considering the above points, between colored troops recruited from the free States and those from the slave States?
Brooks received six replies, of which those from Captain Joseph Walker and Lieutenant Hiram Farrand appear in Note 19 of Brooks’ report.
To the first question, Brooks indicated all those polled felt “the black is more timorous than the white, but is in a corresponding degree more docile and obedient, hence more completely under the control of his commander….” Walker explained further:
I will say, in my opinion, their courage is rather of the passive than the active kind. They will stay, endure, resist, and follow, but they have not the restless, aggressive spirit. I do not believe they will desert their officers in trying moments in so great numbers as the whites; they have not the will, audacity, or fertility of excuse of the straggling white, and at the same time they have not the heroic, nervous energy, or vivid perception of the white, who stands firm or presses forward.
He added that he knew of no instances where the USCT had avoided duty, but the same could not be said for the white troops.
Although all observers felt the black troops were less skilled than whites, the skill level was more than sufficient for siege work and soldiering. But as for appreciation of the work at hand, the black troops appeared to make up ground. As Farrand observed:
White soldiers are more intelligent and experienced, and, of course, more skillful, than black ones, but they have not generally a corresponding appreciation of their duties. As a consequence, I have, in most cases, found the work as well done by black as by white soldiers.
I think this is significant. We might explain the lack of skills within the individual experiences – in particular educational backgrounds. But appreciation for duties is something derived from the individual’s situational awareness.
As for the quantity of work performed, Brooks noted that all agreed, “the black will do a greater amount of work than the white soldier, because he labors more consistently.” Walker added in his response:
I think they will do more than the whites; they do not have so many complaints and excuses, but stick to their work patiently, doggedly, obediently, and accomplish a great deal, though I have never known them to work with any marked spirit or energy. I should liken the white man to the horse (often untractable and balky); the black man to the ox.
In line with that assessment, to the fourth question, Brooks summarized, “The whites are decidedly superior in enthusiasm.” Walker offered an amateur analysis, “… there is a hard, nervous organization at the bottom of the character of the white, and a soft, susceptible one at the bottom of the character of the black.”
In regard to the performance of those recruited from slave states compared to those from free states, all felt those from the north performed better. Walker stated, “They have more of the self-reliance, and approximate nearer to the qualities of the white man, in respect to dash and energy….”
Walker went on to add his own summary:
To me they compare favorably with the whites; they are easily handled, true and obedient; there is less viciousness among them; they are more patient; they have great constancy. The character of the white, as you know, runs to extremes; one has bull-dog courage, another is a pitiful cur; one is excessively vicious, another pure and noble. The phases of the character of the white touches the stars and descends to the lowest depths. The black character occupies the inner circle. Their status is mediocrity, and this uniformity and mediocrity, for military fatigue duty, I think answers best.
Reading this 150 years later, one must keep in mind the context. And an important part of that context was that on Morris Island white and black regiments performed duties within the same set of trenches, in close proximity. Perhaps not an “integrated” force, but at least one where a few preconceptions were broken.
At the end of his report, Brooks offered an observation worth noting:
The efficiency and health of a battalion depends so much upon its officers, that, in order to institute a fair comparison, when so small a number of troops are considered, this element should be eliminated. That has not, however, been attempted in this paper.
The matter called for more study, to be sure. An army does not simply recruit a good regiment. Rather good leaders train a group of recruited men into a good regiment. I think those observing the performance of the troops on Morris Island saw that held true regardless of skin color.
(Source: OR, Series I, Volume 28, Part I, Serial 46, pages 328-31.)