8-inch Parrott Rifle, Part 2

Earlier I introduced the 8-inch Parrott rifle and discussed the design and production particulars.  Time to look at the functional and operational aspects of the weapon.

The 8-inch Parrotts used projectiles designed by Robert Parrott, of course, along with those of Charles T. James and John Schenkl.  However, those of Parrott were obviously better adapted for the guns.  Modern historians have identified three general variations among the Parrott projectile designs, differing with regard to the construction of the brass sabot.  For the big 8-inch projectiles, only Types II and III are known, with high and low attachment points for the brass band over the base of the round.  While the Army apparently ordered both types, the Navy preferred Type II.  Although when stocks were low, the Navy used Type III projectiles either from Army sources or direct from the vendor.

Like the smaller 6.4-inch Parrott, the 8-inch model’s solid bolt projectiles were designed with warships or fortifications as primary targets.  For anti-ship use, the Navy preferred a lighter bolt than the Army.  Navy ordinance officers focused on Confederate ironclad targets.  Typically such engagements were close range affairs.  Navy instructions called for the use of light weight bolt with “chilled” noses.   Such projectiles accelerated rapidly maximizing penetration under 1000 yards, at the sacrifice of accuracy and effectiveness at longer ranges. Thus shot for the Navy’s 8-inch Parrotts weighed between 125 and 150 pounds and between 12 and 14 inches long.

The Army, however, preferred to engage enemy ironclads at greater ranges.  Heavier bolts offered better accuracy, and penetrating force, at those ranges.  Army bolts weighed 200 pounds and was about 17 inches long.

The 8-inch Parrotts also used “long” and “short” Parrott shells, but the service distinction appears less explicit.  The Navy used anything available at several points in the war, particularly during the 1864 bombardment of Fort Fisher, North Carolina.   But perhaps the most famous of the 8-inch shells were those hurled by the “Swamp Angel” into Charleston, South Carolina in 1863.   A few 8-inch shells, either from the famous gun or fired at later points in the war by less famous Parrott guns, have been recovered over the years in Charleston.

Charleston 4 May 10 115
8-inch Parrott Shell - Charleston Museum

Other Parrott shells fired into Charleston included incendiary rounds.  West Point Foundry produced 500 of these in 1863, in both single and double cavity shells.   A hexagonal-headed bolt in the base of the shell covered an opening into which the incendiary mixture was loaded.

Besides Parrott shells, the Army used Schenkl shells in the Charleston area.  Due to concerns about Parrott Projectile performance, the Navy placed large orders for Schenkl 8-inch projectiles.  However, after Schenkl died in an accident, Parrott came back into favor.

Charleston 4 May 10 137
8-inch Schenkl Shell - Charleston Museum

The Army ordered 100 8-inch James shot, although none survive today.  However, a few James shells in the caliber survived the war.  Except for some experimental rifles, the only the 8-inch Parrotts could fire these projectiles.

During the war, the Navy also issued grapeshot to some monitors armed with 8-inch Parrotts.  Originally intended for 8-inch shell guns, the grapeshot provided a means to repel boarders or for use in close quarters combat.

Army instructions indicted the 8-inch Parrott could use the same carriage as a 10-inch Rodman gun.  Arrangements were similar, although scaled up, from the 6.4-inch Parrotts for center and front pintle mountings.   The Navy used the 8-inch rifles on pivot mounts or in turret mounts.   On the pivot, the big rifle required a crew of 25.  However, in the monitor turrets, mechanized handling gear reduced the crew to between 7 and 14.

The projectiles and carriages allowed the 8-inch Parrotts to batter enemy ships and batter fortifications.  In my next post in this series, I’ll look at the instances where the big rifles were used in those capacities.


Sources, aside from field notes, consulted for this post:

Ordnance Instructions for the United States Navy.  Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1866.  (See page 102-104 for discussion of Navy projectiles in particular the light weight shot.)

John C. Tidball. Manual of Heavy Artillery Service.  Washington:  James J. Chapman, 1891.  (See page 2 for references about use of carriages.)

Bell, Jack. Civil War Heavy Explosive Ordnance:  A Guide to Large Artillery, Projectiles, Torpedoes, and Mines. Denton, Texas:  University of North Texas Press, 2003.

Olmstead, Edwin, Wayne E. Stark, and Spencer C. Tucker. The Big Guns: Civil War Siege, Seacoast and Naval Cannon. Alexandria Bay, NY: Museum Restoration Service, 1997.

Ripley, Warren. Artillery and Ammunition of the Civil War, 4th Edition. Charleston, S.C.: The Battery Press, 1984.

Tucker, Spencer.  Arming the Fleet:  U.S. Navy Ordnance in the Muzzle-Loading Era.  Annapolis, Maryland:  Naval Institute Press, 1989.

Valour-IT Fundraising Competition

Please allow me a break from Civil War related posts to ask readers to consider a worthy cause – Valour-IT.

Valour-IT is a project under Soldiers’ Angels, an non-profit organization which provides aid and comfort to military members.   The goal of Valour-IT is to put information technology and other advanced technology in the hands of severely wounded service members.  According to their website, the project distributed over 4100 laptops to wounded warriors (and that number, reached last year at this time, has long since been surpassed).   Most of those laptops include voice-controlled software to help the user overcome disabilities.  Valour-IT works with soldier care facilities and DoD case workers to maximize use of the resources.

For soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines who have suffered severe wounds, those “gadgets” are not just toys for entertainment.  Rather these are critical support aids to their recovery.  Computer resources in particular are almost a necessity in our society today.  Putting one of these laptops, with enhanced access features, in the hands of a wounded warrior allows them to connect to their world, re-focus or re-train, and heal as a whole person.

Right now, Valour-IT is running its annual fund-raising competition.  Between now and Veterans Day (November 11) contributors are asked to affiliate with their “branch” – Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marines.  Or if you don’t wish to further inter-service rivalries, you may donate without affiliation.  Since my background is Army….. Go Team Army!

learn more

Even if you cannot give at this time, I encourage you to look over the Soldiers’ Angels site.  This is a class-act organization supporting those who serve our country.

h/t to top Milblogger and retired First Sergeant “Bouhammer.”

HMDB Civil War Updates – Week of October 25

This week, twenty-one additions to the Civil War category in the Historical Marker Database.  States represented include Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Missouri, New York, Tennessee, Virginia, and Wisconsin.

– Three markers in Brierfield, Alabama.  The Bibb Furnace produced iron for the Confederate Navy during the war.  The furnace was destroyed by Gen. Wilson’s Federal raiders in March 1865.  However, in an act of defiance, Mary Pratt, who operated a nearby ferry over the Cahaba River, set the boat adrift rather than allow its use by the raiders.

– A new marker in Atlanta provides an overview of the battles which raged for control of the city in 1864.

– A state marker provides construction details of Fort Tyler.  The fort defended bridges over the Chattahoochie River, but fell to Wilson’s raiders on April 16, 1865.

– Several entries from Columbus, Kentucky this week as I enter the markers at the Columbus-Belmont State Park.  Confederates occupied this “Gibraltar of the West” in September 1861.   Markers on site provide interpretation about the Battle of Belmont which was fought on the Missouri side opposite Columbus, the wartime river traffic on the river, and how the war transformed the town of Columbus.

– A memorial in Carthage, Missouri recalls the battle fought there on July 5, 1861.

– A small stone marker notes the battle of Rader’s Farm, fought May 18, 1863 in the present day city of Joplin, Missouri.

– A memorial in Webb City, Missouri honoring veterans from several wars  includes a list of Civil War Medal of Honor recipients from Missouri.

– A memorial in Peekskill, New York honors the veterans from the town of Cortlandt who served in the war.

– Entries from Humboldt and Trenton, Tennessee recall a raid by General N.B. Forrest in December 1862.  Earlier in the raid, Forrest clashed with Federals in the battle of Salem Cemetery near Jackson, Tennessee.  Forrest also routed an enemy force at Spring Creek.

– A Tennessee Civil War Trails marker notes the last camp site used by Confederate General A.S. Johnston before the battle of Shiloh.

– New interpretive kiosk on the Richmond Battlefield details Fort Gilmer.

– In Page Valley, near the locality of Overall, Virginia, a new Civil War Trails marker discusses the battle of Milford, fought on September 22, 1864.

– A marker in Jefferson County, Wisconsin details the number of men from the state who served in our country’s wars.  According to the marker, the state sent 91,379 men to the colors during the war.  12,216 Wisconsin troops died in the war.