Category Archives: American Civil War

150 years ago: Arm citizens for defense of Charleston?

By mid-May 1863 two brigades, those of Brigadier-General S.R. Gist and Brigadier-General W.H.T. Walker, had left the Atlantic coast to reinforce Confederate forces in Mississippi.  The departure of these two brigades, pending transfer of more troops, and reallocation of heavy guns left many in South Carolina and Georgia feeling nervous.  Were their needs being overlooked, again?

Congressman William Porcher Miles, along with others to include Charleston Mayor Charles Macbeth, pressured Richmond to reverse the shift of troops and resources.  On May 13, 1863, Secretary of War James Seddon responded to these demands:

Gentlemen: Your telegrams remonstrating against the orders of the Department withdrawing troops from Charleston for the defense of Vicksburg and the Mississippi have been received with much concern and have caused anxious inquiry and reflection. You cannot doubt that the utmost solicitude is felt for the adequate defense and protection of your city, both for its intrinsic importance and the political significance that attaches to it, and that without the gravest consideration neither the apprehensions of its citizens would be awakened nor any portion of its gallant defenders be withdrawn. We are not however, unfortunately, so supplied with forces that we can retain them at all points we would wish to preserve without the sense of insecurity, but are obliged to employ them where great and pressing danger imperatively demands their presence and succor.

Now, while we can understand and appreciate the anxieties felt by yourselves and your fellow-citizens, yet we cannot think they rest on such foundations as ought to deter from the use of the force in your department on a field of more imminent danger and not less importance.

The prestige of your late brilliant victory will itself avail much to deter the enemy. Besides, we have satisfactory assurance that, a large portion of the enemy’s forces has been withdrawn from the vicinity of Charleston–first to North Carolina, and, since the late battle of Chancellorsville, to re-enforce Hooker. The near approach, too, of your sickly season and the present sultry weather give added confidence of no serious danger of attack on Charleston.
The enemy cannot have more than 10,000 or 15,000 troops at the at-most near you. Now, on inspection of the last returns (near the close of April) from your military department, it appears that after all deductions from the number of effectives then returned for the troops sent back to North Carolina and ordered to Mississippi, there will be left for the defense of Charleston and Savannah more than 15,000 troops of all arms; of these I have directed 5,000 should be tried infantry. Surely, with this force you can be in no serious danger, considering the superiority of spirit and valor in your soldiers and the advantages of intrenchments, from a force probably not equal, certainly not superior, of the Yankee enemy.

This being the real condition, I beg you to reflect on the vital importance of the Mississippi to our cause, to South Carolina, and to Charleston itself. Scarce any point in the Confederacy can be deemed more essential, for the “cause of each is the cause of all,” and the sundering of the Confederacy would be felt as almost a mortal blow to the most remote parts. Surely, if even some risk were incurred the end would justify it. You do not know, and I could be scarcely justified in stating, the causes that preclude succor from General Lee’s army and other points to General Pemberton, but you may rely upon it that only on the fullest consideration and under the gravest necessity is the draft made on Charleston and persisted in, despite the earnest remonstrance of gentlemen so highly esteemed as yourselves.

I can only add, in conclusion, that I would advise the organization, at least by mustering and arming, of all citizens among you capable of bearing arms. A force very effective behind intrenchments might thus be added to your military defenders.

In the middle of 1863, Seddon sounded a lot like General Albert S. Johnston had in the winter of 1862.  Maybe not the same assessment, but similar conclusions.  Seddon, and by extension the top leadership in Richmond, felt the Mississippi had priority of effort.  Charleston, after all, was under much less pressure.  A recent victory had set the Federals back on their heels.  He felt for sure the Yankees had shifted troops north to bolster the Army of the Potomac after defeat at Chancellorsville.  His estimate of the Federal strength was not far off, as returns dated May 10 indicated only 16,259 men in the Department of the South (although that was just a temporary “dip” in numbers).  And, as he put it, the “sickly season and the present sultry weather” would dissuade the Federals from major operations.

Sure, we know well with a century and a half of hindsight that Virginia and Mississippi were the important sectors at that stage of the war. No disputes there, save those South Carolinians.  But it is that last paragraph that stands out to me – “...I would advise the organization, at least by mustering and arming, of all citizens among you capable of bearing arms.”  That sounds close to Johnston’s call for the “greatest effort.”

General P.G.T. Beauregard’s Department would have to defend Florida, South Carolina, and Georgia with the meager resources on hand.  And at the same time expect to forward more troops as required to shore up lines elsewhere.  What was not expected is Federal troops opposing Beauregard rose to 24,737 troops by early June.  And the Federals were indeed planning offensive operations in spite of the summer weather.

More importantly, consider Seddon’s response here in context of other happenings at the close of May and early June in Mississippi and Virginia.

150 years ago: Battle of Big Black River Bridge, and I have nothing for you!

Looking back 150 years ago, in the aftermath of the battle of Champion Hill Federal troops in Major-General John McClernand’s Thirteenth Army Corps pursued Confederates west towards Vicksburg. A little over half way to Vicksburg, McClernand’s lead elements ran into a Confederate defense setup along the Big Black River, covering the railroad bridge.

This is one of my favorite battles in the Vicksburg campaign. Not for any particular reason. I’ve simply found it fascinating. I wanted to post something proper for the battle. But this morning the combination of pollen blooms and the hot-cold-hot spring weather has withered my ability to focus on writing. I don’t even want to dig out my 1990s photos of the battlefield.

So let me offer up instead an excellent set of photos from Bruce’s Civil War Album showing the landscape as it appears today. Big Black River Bridge was fought in the bottom lands with meander scars, bayous, and cypress stands factoring into the troop movements. The critical moment of this battle occurred on the Federal right where Brigadier-General Michael K. Lawler mounted a brigade assault.

photo of Michael Kelly Lawler (1814-1882)

Brig. Gen. Michael K. Lawler

Lawler’s assault – with the 21st Iowa, 23rd Iowa, and 11th Wisconsin with the 22nd Iowa the reserve – is a good example of a successful brigade level attack. Artillery support was ample. And reinforcements arrived where needed, at the time needed. All in contrast to some other brigade level attacks that we might consider.

Recalling the success, Major-General Ulysses S. Grant later wrote “I heard great cheering to the right of our line and, looking in that direction, saw Lawler in his shirt sleeves leading a charge upon the enemy. I immediately mounted my horse and rode in the direction of the charge.” Grant was too often the beneficiary of such unexpected success on the battlefield. Seems to me there was more than just luck and happenstance at work.

Some Confederates made their way over the river and back to Vicksburg, but about 1,700 were captured. In addition to the troops, Lawler’s men captured six 12-pdr howitzers, three 12-pdr Napoleons, three 6-pdr guns, and six 10-pdr Parrotts. Eighteen guns at the Big Black. Just days earlier at Raymond, Federals captured a similar number of guns. Add to that Confederate artillery losses at Jackson and Champon Hill. Yes, out west the Confederates were shedding an Army’s worth of artillery in the course of a campaign.

Sorry for a non-substantial post today. If I feel better this evening, I’ll do Lawler’s assault the justice it deserves. Until then, you might consider this “alternative” version of the Battle of Big Black River Bridge:

Oh, I long for the simple days where a pair of dice and an Avalon-Hill box were sufficient.

Ye Olde English Gun… on Sullivan’s Island!

You may have seen this wartime photo of the Sullivan’s Island defenses before.

The photo shows two guns in Fort Marshall. The caption from the Library of Congress states this is the northeast angle of the fort. The photo was one of many taken of the defenses of Charleston in 1865 after the Federals occupied the city.

Let me go all Garry Adelman for a bit. There’s a Brooke single banded rifle (I think) on the left. But it is hard to glean any details from the photo. On the right, the closer gun, is a siege gun. And that gun is a bit more interesting, if you are trying to match surviving guns to wartime photos.

oldEnglishGunFtMarshalla

Nice study of a siege carriage, with a few implements as props. The size and mounting are the type used for 12-pdr siege guns. But notice a few particulars about this gun. There’s a breech loop over the knob. There’s a band over the breech. And there’s something like ornamentation on top of the barrel over the trunnions.

oldEnglishGunFtMarshallb

Well, well! That’s just like this gun:

Charleston 4 May 10 181

Yes, one of the old English 12-pdrs banded and rifled by the Confederates. The gun, as mentioned earlier, is on display at the Old Powder Magazine in Charleston. A refresher from the walk around provided, that particular gun’s trunnions, cascabel, and breeching loop are missing, with only scars on the metal. But that royal seal is on the top of the barrel.

Charleston 4 May 10 187

Certainly similar guns. But there were several old English guns converted to rifles by the Confederates. Without some definitive marking to work from (alas those missing trunnions!), I can only suggest the surviving gun was at Fort Marshall.

One other detail from the photo that I’d call attention to. Look at the ammunition stored in a little hut to the side of the gun.

OldEnglishGunFortMarshallc

Grape, canister, and either solid bolts or shells. There’s more of the first two types than the later. That, of course, gives some indication as to the intended use of this weapon – to sweep the beaches and dunes of any attackers on foot. And speaking of beach, look at all that sand piling up next to the projectiles.

You can almost feel the sand between your toes just looking at that photo.

But why would the photographer chose this particular setting? Don’t get me wrong, I like a good cannon photograph. But what attracted the cameraman’s eye when he setup this particular shot?